Lawn/Turf including Golf courses
Many resources on this topic are included in SNAP's program page under Organic Land Care Training for Municipal Officials...and Organic Gardening Class/ Tips,. Alterntives/Weeds, IPM.
Also see bylaws/general, safety
Lawns and Landscapes (Beyond Pesticides)
BACKGROUNDER: Busting the myths about cosmetic pesticide bans (EcoJustice) worth repeating every year at this time when cosmetic pesticide use starts in earnest.Well-researched 10 point backgrounder. Full of links.
Golf, Pesticides, and Organic Practices (Beyond Pesticides, 'Agricultural chemicals are heavily used on golf courses, with four to seven times greater than the recommended doses meant for any agricultural farms (Feldman, 2020; Golf ventures, 2019).' (Additional burden of cancers due to environmental carcinogens in Newfoundland and Labrador: a spatial analysis (Rahman et al, Environmental Health Review, 13 November 2020) For ultraviolet rays , arsenic, disinfection by-products , and agricultural chemicals, the RR (95% CI) were 1.5 (1.4–1.6), 1.25 (1.03–1.51), 1.8 (1.67–1.94), and 1.49 (1.3–1.7), respectively. )
Did Ontario Golf Courses reduce pesticide use with Integrated Pest Management? (Prevent Cancer Now, November 2020) 'Fast forward 10 years: Prevent Cancer Now asked the Ontario Government and the IPM Council of Canada whether or not pesticide use had decreased on Ontario golf courses. Neither could answer. As a result Prevent Cancer Now examined reports from 16 higher-end Ontario golf courses to determine whether use of pesticides had declined. Key findings of the study include:
- overall, use of herbicides, fungicides and insecticides increased between 2010 and 2017 (see bar chart above);
- three fungicides, three herbicides and all insecticides used on the studied Ontario golf courses have been identified as “highly hazardous” by international authorities (e.g., World Health Organization, European Union and US EPA);
- a small number of courses fared better than others, applying one fifth the amount of pesticides (measured as equivalent hectares treated) compared with high users (see line graph below);'
SNAP Comment: For all practical purposes, the answer is mostly NO. Why? Likely because of who the IPM Council or Canada is (industry associations and groups committed to having IPM as standard) and their widely used faulty definition of IPM used. An appropriate definition of IPM prioritizes non-toxic methods first rather than considering chemical pesticides as a same level option.
High Income, Peer-Pressure Correlated with Chemical-Intensive Yard Care Practices (Beyond Pesticides, December 3, 2019) ' Lawns cover 63,000 sq ft in the United States, four times as much land as corn, making them the largest crop in the country. So while decisions over whether to irrigate, fertilize, or spray pesticides are made at the household level, even minor changes in practices could have major impacts on the environment... Higher income individuals are 23% more likely to irrigate their property, 26% more likely to fertilize, and 16% more likely to apply pesticides.' Also discusses alternatives.
The Great American Lawn: How the Dream was Manufactured. (New York Times) 7:10 minutes video
Lawns on golf courses Dad and the Dandelion (CBC The Nature of Things ,March 2, 2017) including link to the full episode. trailer